Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Miguel Uribe Turbay in 2019
Miguel Uribe Turbay

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.

Archives

[edit]

Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives

Sections

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


August 23

[edit]

Law and crime


August 22

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Jaswinder Bhalla

[edit]
Article: Jaswinder Bhalla (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hindustan
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Famed Punjabi comedian QalasQalas (talk) 12:57, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza Strip famine

[edit]
Article: Gaza Strip famine (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The United Nations declares famine in Gaza. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The United Nations-affiliated Integrated Food Security Phase Classification confirms/declares famine in Gaza.
Alternative blurb II: ​ The United Nations-affiliated Integrated Food Security Phase Classification confirms/declares famine in Gaza City.
News source(s): UNICEF, Guardian, NY Times, WaPo, BBC
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Long expected. While we have ongoing for the war. This is notable beyond that and succintly summarizes what has been happening in the region since our last blurb on the war. Gotitbro (talk) 12:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning support on notability I haven't read the article in depth; it's quite long and apparently comprehensive, but let's bear in mind that in its coverage of the Gaza war, Al Jazeera is considered an unreliable source and is cited in several lines and paragraphs, which makes me wonder to what extent it complies with the required neutrality, without detracting from its attempts to ensure it by Wiki editors. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:54, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alsoriano97 AJ is considered biased but not unreliable in the context of the war - using them as a citation isn’t an issue. That said, for contentious claims/etc attribution and the addition of other RSes to back them up should be the standard. The Kip (contribs) 13:02, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@The Kip Okay, thank you for the clarification. _-_Alsor (talk) 13:08, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Having the UN officially state something that most sources and rationale people have recognized for months seems not to be a major step, given we have that have the gaza strip ongoing already. Masem (t) 12:58, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There was a severe risk of famine but no international organization had explicitly declared it as such. Most sources were reporting on deliberate starvation rather than famine. This is the first major report by the FAO, WFP, WHO, UNICEF and various other UN agencies declaring famine (akin to a declaration of epidemic/pandemic by the WHO), per the well established Integrated Food Security Phase Classification. Gotitbro (talk) 13:54, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Then another question is, what happens now? If its just a declaration that has no grounded impact, then this is all hot air. But if this directs UN nations to combat the famine by any means necessary, that would be different. Masem (t) 16:12, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Per the report, unless Israel allows aid in the famine will spread further and start resulting in mass deaths (edit: more mass deaths, deaths are happening right now). ITN cannot tell, much like pandemic declarations or IPCC reports, what the impact of the expert reports will be but we can tell that a declaration of famine anywhere in the world is a significant news item. Gotitbro (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    So, unfortunately, its just a bit of hot air, similar to the Doomsday Clock or the UN's global warming assessments. Deaths from starvation would still happen regardless of this declaration, and unless we have nations asserting they will take action to end the famine (either by aid or pressuring Israel to stop the conflict), it feels like an empty statement. Masem (t) 18:50, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Its not a statement, its the recognition of a famine. The famine is occuring now, the deaths are hapenning now and more deaths will happen ahead. Do we for instance say that the decalaration of a pandemic by the WHO is "hot air". This is a health emergency and has been recognized as such. Only four such assessments in the past have followed for famines. ITN can choose to ignore a lot of things based on expected outcome but rarely do we make that assessment for health-related emergencies. Gotitbro (talk) 19:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not trying to downplay this, but right now, all I can see in the article on this news item is "On 22 August, the IPC and the FRC confirmed famine within the Gaza Governorate, warning that the classification could spread throughout Gaza". As I commented below, that's nowhere close to a sufficient update for ITN, and that's why I'm trying to figure out what else can be added. If this sets a health emergency situation, then what steps will follow from that, or are they just sitting there stating that, expecting others to act? Masem (t) 01:04, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Regardless of my questions, I can only see one line about this in the article (up in the lede, not in the body), so this is nowhere close to a sufficient update for posting. There needs to be discussion of what this means and what happens next, and not just a declaration. Masem (t) 18:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose To start with, the blurb is incorrect as it's not the UN which has declared a famine but the IPC which is a more complex body with numerous members besides some UN agencies such as Oxfam and other charities. Getting such details right is essential as this is a contentious topic. As the target article was already quite substantial over a year ago, seems more focussed on 2024 than 2025 and such developments are covered by ongoing, I'm not convinced that this report is more than a technical formality. Note also that the report seems to have declared the famine in the Gaza Governorate, which is one of five regions in the strip. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:49, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The IPC is a classification system used by different UN agencies, primarily FAO, and not an independent institution of its own accord. The report itself was prepared by different UN agencies (thought about listing them individually but went with a generic UN per most news reports). We can adjust to Gaza to Gaza governorate (again went with news reports here for a succint blurb, but most of the population is anyhow afflicted). I don't believe any of this affects notability, explicit IPC famine reports are not ordinary. Gotitbro (talk) 15:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The IPC is an institution with its own offices, structure and governance, as explained here. The report was produced by its Famine Review Committee which is not a UN body. The report is somewhat like an academic paper but the review process is somewhat different. The terms of reference indicate that an analysis team makes a determination and then the FRC validates it. On paper, it seems like a reasonable process but it's different from the usual peer review of academic journals. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:36, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The BBC report says "The IPC cannot officially declare famine - that is usually done by governments or the United Nations." I'm not sure what this means for the current declaration and it seems remarkably bureaucratic and confusing. But again, we need to ensure that all these finicky details are stated correctly before we post a blurb. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:02, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The IPC itself is not an independent body, broadly under the FAO its committees and reports are constitutive of it and other UN institutions. But beyond the technical details, reports issued under that classification of food insecurity are the standard for a determination of an occurence of famine under the UN system.
    The BBC report also says this:

    Only four previous famines have been classified by the IPC since it was established in 2004, the most recent in Sudan in 2024. ... In response to the report, UN aid chief Tom Fletcher said the famine was entirely preventable, saying food could not get through to the Palestinian territory "because of systematic obstruction by Israel". UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said: "Just when it seems there are no words left to describe the living hell in Gaza, a new one has been added: 'famine'."

    We can get stuck discussing the technicalities of how the IPC operates or realize that an entirely preventable man-made famine has been recognized by the top UN bodies responsible for doing so, which rarely do so. Gotitbro (talk) 18:39, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    As this is a contentious topic, we have to do it the hard way. For more on the technicalities, see What does it take for a famine to be declared in Gaza?. This, like the BBC, says "Still, neither FEWS NET nor the IPC makes the official declaration. "It's up to government institutions, United Nations upper leadership, and other high-level representatives to actually make a famine declaration," Hoffine said.". It's not clear to me that this official declaration has been made. What seems to have happened today is that the FRC released their report. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:05, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I think an alt blurb has been proposed, blurb terminology can always be fine tuned. The 'hard way' is that this is the top UN report responsible for famine recognition, 'declaration' [as a term] maybe made by whatever political body is concerned but the scientific assessment here is pretty clear [we don't hold our breaths for individual governments to follow up after a WHO declaration of a pandemic and this is really no different (this report is also by the WHO)]. A famine is occuring and we should go with what RS are actually reporting and not bury our heads in the sand. That this is only the fourth such recognition of famine on the IPC scale in the 21st-century is already telling where things stand. Gotitbro (talk) 19:19, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It has already been clear for some time that people are going hungry and suffering in Gaza. For example, the Gaza war article that we have in Ongoing says "The Gaza Strip is experiencing a humanitarian crisis as a result of the war, including a hunger crisis, in which famine-like conditions occurred in some areas of the strip and a high risk of famine persists as of October 2024" – that's almost a year ago. So, what's new here is the formal declaration and the sources indicate that this is significant legally for issues such as war crimes. So, as the key news is the formal declaration then the exact formalities are what matters. I'm still opposed until it's clear that we are reporting this accurately. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support Page View Its important to Post and crucial situation has caused a humanitarian crisis and it’s terrifying to see vulnerable women and children deliberately starved. However maintaining NPOV is essential to verify information and avoid bias so my suggest could be credible sources similar to UN reports and Amnesty International. QalasQalas (talk) 15:46, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Considering that the IPC definition of "famine" was changed from 30% of the affected children are acutely malnourished (as per previous declarations) to 15%, and that it relies heavily on numbers provided by Hamas, it smacks of propaganda stunt. 128.91.40.237 (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Striking non-ECP comment per WP:ARBPIA. And just as a heads up for anyone who comes across this, the IP above is repeating Israeli government propaganda (read lies) against the report. From Science (journal):

But even before the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) group released two reports today, the Israeli military and other critics attacked the science underlying the assessments, arguing that IPC changed the goalposts to make declaring a famine easier. ... Changes to IPC’s assessments that critics are complaining about were made 6 years ago, long before the start of the latest Israel-Hamas war, they point out. ... In most situations, IPC does rely on children’s weight-to-height “z-score.” But amid armed conflict or in remote and difficult-to-reach areas, a MUAC measurement, which only requires a tape measure, is far easier to obtain and can be used instead, according to IPC guidelines. MUAC measurements identify only about half the number of children as malnourished compared with weight-to-height measures, which is why IPC sets the MUAC threshold lower, at 15% instead of 30%. MUAC measurements, and that threshold, were not “quietly” introduced in late July but have been accepted since 2019, when their use was described in an IPC Technical Manual that was updated in 2021. They have previously been used in famine classifications in South Sudan in November 2020 and in Sudan in December 2024. They were also used in all previous reviews of the situation in Gaza. (International hunger watchdog faces political attacks over Gaza famine declaration)

Gotitbro (talk) 18:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That said, most sources are using the “Gaza City and surrounding areas” terminology, hence why I simply put Gaza City in ALT2. The Kip (contribs) 05:22, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support altblurb2 as the famine is specifically in Gaza City. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:48, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Zuristyo Firmadata

[edit]
Article: Zuristyo Firmadata (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/NG9CQ0ZE-ketua-dpw-nasdem-babel-zuristyo-firmadata-meninggal-dunia
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former Indonesian MP. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 09:55, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 21

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Brent Hinds

[edit]
Article: Brent Hinds (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Atlanta News First Forbes Variety
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Founding member and co-vocalist of the Grammy-winning progressive metal band Mastodon ItsShandog (talk) 16:55, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose on quality Sad to see this guy, go, man, Mastodon was a band that really got me down the metal rabbit hole. The guest appearances section I think needs a bit more sourcing and it should be good. TheBlueSkyClub (talk) 06:13, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve added reliable sources where available, and used citation needed templates for unsourced claims in case others can help verify them. ItsShandog (talk) 10:14, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD/Blurb: James Dobson

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: James Dobson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Evangelical leader, James Dobson, (pictured) dies at the age of 89. (Post)
News source(s): New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American evangelical Christian author (born 1936) jolielover♥talk 14:21, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Needs too much work correcting tenses, other copy-editing and pruning the tendentious argumentation. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not Quite Ready Needs a little copyediting to reflect his recent passing. That said, the page is not in bad shape, and surprisingly, is pretty well referenced. Not a huge fan but he was one of the most influential figures in the right wing of America's culture wars. I'd consider a blurb. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • He was described as "the nation's most influential evangelical leader" and so was at the top of his field. As we have a good picture too, a blurb seems a reasonable option. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:03, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ehhhh, I don't think he has that much international impact for a blurb. I didn't know he existed until after his death. Although I'm pretty neutral and don't mind either way. jolielover♥talk 16:20, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD Great quality for RD, but not quite worthy of a blurb. MallardTV Talk to me! 16:35, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality. Could use some citation fixes as is usual, but this article doesn't seem too far off. As far as a blurb goes, I'm opposing here too. I get this isn't usually a great barometer, but for all this article says about Dobson's supposed impact on American cultural debate, I couldn't for the life of me told you who he was before I saw this nomination. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson? Yeah. But I can't fathom Dobson being on the same level, regardless of what superlative claims the article has. Beyond this, while the article seems to suggest he was the successor to Falwell and Robertson, the "Social influence" section of his article is conspicuously bare on things he's been credited with over the past two decades (aka when Falwell died). Perhaps I'm getting too far into the weeds, but I...don't see the level of impact that is seemly being attributed to him by the lede in the body of the article. DarkSide830 (talk) 16:38, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blurb per others; while perhaps influential in America, he wasn't critical to the nation and not nearly to the level that any national figure could be blurb-able. Also, I think a discussion should be held to split the list of books he authored from the main page, because it seems there's an awful lot, maybe with a lot to say, and as of now it's just a list with no elaboration that still takes up a substantial amount of space on the page of over 100,000 bytes including references - am I wrong or is that split territory? Departure– (talk) 16:45, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support RD, oppose blurb for better or worse he was a major influence on American religion - but not as big of an influence to be blurb-worthy. --FelineHerder (talk) 16:53, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose at this moment, the article needs more citation work. Also Weak Oppose Blurb because I don't see how his life had major international impact ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 16:57, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurb, not ready for RD on quality, sure, he founded Focus on the Family which is culturally responsible for some of the problems the US is staring down the barrel of and all but making the cultural divide the culture war, but there were many more prominent leaders in that respect who used his organization as the vehicle for their own cultural crusades. --GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 17:55, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly oppose blurb for the usual reasons. He is just another American celebrity who was neither top of his field nor a truly transformative figure. Billy Graham was surely "the nation's most influential evangelical leader" in living memory, right? Humbledaisy (talk) 18:27, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD, Oppose Blurb - the quality looks OK now. But for all that the article says Dobson was 'imagined' as an evangelical pope issuing edicts from a protestant Vatican in Colorado Springs, we must be realistic and recognise that he was nothing of the sort. He was a demagogue (and a liar) but he was never the leader of a major denomination, and his was only one of several prominent voices in the US evangelical conservative movement of his era. GenevieveDEon (talk) 18:30, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    He was hugely important partly because he was extra-denominational. His influence through Focus on the Family was part of the transition from the importance of denominations to the rise of parachurch organizations. His influence last longer and peaks later than similar leaders "of his era" like Ralph Reed, Randall Terry, Jerry Falwell, and Pat Robertson. Jahaza (talk) 23:41, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not ready for RD The article is still littered with too many citation needed / unreliable source / better source needed tags. Oppose blurb per everyone. He was not a nobody by any means, but he was at most a political activist on the level of other people who we did not post. The only evangelical American preacher we posted (to my knowledge at least) was Billy Graham. Dobson probably made the list of most noteworthy evangelical activists/lobbyists, but there's countless influential lobbyist organizations for a countless number of political stances, so that's just too specific a "field." I wouldn't even agree with calling Dobson a major household name in the US; he has less name recognition than Kenneth Copeland (according to google trends at least, admittedly not a good argument for ITN), but I certainly wouldn't blurb Copeland either.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 19:16, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb because it's nonsense and oppose RD on quality. Some lines are unsourced and there's some CN tags. _-_Alsor (talk) 20:50, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not ready as there are currently sourcing issues. I support an RD only since he wasn't notable on par with a world leader nor transformative in his field. 5.57.243.123 (talk) 23:12, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet ready for RD, oppose blurb per above. There are still several CN tags, and there's nothing blurbworthy about this death. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 23:26, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 20

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Humpy Wheeler

[edit]
Article: Humpy Wheeler (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NASCAR.com
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 240F:7A:6253:1:6962:248B:60D8:86BC (talk) 08:15, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Józef Kowalczyk

[edit]
Article: Józef Kowalczyk (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Gazeta Krakowska, Polish Radio
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Catholic bishop and primate of Poland EUPBR (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted as RD) RD/Blurb : Frank Caprio

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Frank Caprio (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Frank Caprio (pictured), the Rhode Island judge who became a TV star, dies at the age of 88. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Chief judge and internet personality Frank Caprio (pictured) dies at the age of 88.
News source(s): BBC, CNN, Hundustan Times, WPRI BNO News
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: RIP. Well-known American judge Johndavies837 (talk) 20:53, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Viral judge regarded as the nicest in America and a YouTuber with millions of subscribers. So sad he died a day after uploading his final short. R.I.P. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:58, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, clearly a notable enough figure to be listed on the Recent Deaths section, the instagram post announcing his passing gained over 400k likes in just an hour. TheFellaVB (talk) 21:10, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As long as somebody has a Wikipedia page, they're automatically worthy of being added to Recent Deaths just as long as their article is not in poor shape, e.g. needing more citations. They could even be an animal (or even a plant)  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 23:06, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This clearly isn't the case, just by looking at the page about 2025 deaths around 20 people with pages pass away every day, many of them with good pages too and proper coverage on their deaths. TheFellaVB (talk) 06:05, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All of them merit their own RD posting. However, it's up to editors to nominate them here. If no one bothers to nominate someone, then it'll never get posted. The quality question also matters: even a large chunk of ITN/R events (mostly sporting events) wind up failing to get posted simply because no one improved the article sufficiently to post it to the front page. So if you see someone/something with an article has passed, by all means please nominate them! Pretty much any editor may make a nomination. Nottheking (talk) 06:43, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please read Wikipedia:In the news/Recent deaths. They obviously will have to be nominated here in the first place. Gotitbro (talk) 06:45, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He is very much not a household name in the US. I think the blurb voters are just having a laugh. GreatCaesarsGhost 11:26, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, I’ve never heard of this guy. EF5 11:41, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He is the late 2010s to 2020s version of Judge Judy, FWIW. Many young people grew up watching clips of his show.
In addition to that, he has a strong reputation as being a very good person: “America’s most empathetic judge”.
None of that is to say I support a blurb, but I understand why he is being nominated and don’t think the support !voters have any bad faith. FlipandFlopped 12:25, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose - we’re not going to post every American pop culture star ever simply because they’re famous. And who gives a crap about the pageviews? EF5 11:42, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb — The subject is not well-known beyond YouTube. I cannot even recall the last time a lower court judge appeared on ITN, let alone one with jurisdiction in a municipal court that doesn't have its own page. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:30, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support blurb At first I thought Judge Caprio was only known among U.S. audiences, but seeing the multiple obits from other countries/languages and the amount of people from different countries following and commenting on his social media accounts, I'd like to say his popularity has extended past YouTube and even mainstream America. If this were a Canadian/Indian/British/Slovakian/Mexican/etc. judge that had the same amount of social media presence as Judge Caprio did, I'd be supporting a blurb also. Evidence of international obits and/or coverage: BBC, Syndey Morning Herald, Toronto Sun, Univision, El Universo, Le Parisien. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:03, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Popularity should never be a reason for a blurb. We can anticipate that if someone has achieved viral fame due to the internet, there will be international coverage of that, and if those are short form obit coverage (which spot checking here those all are), that's less reason to consider a blurb. Masem (t) 16:18, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb - death blurb suggestions are beginning to jump the shark a bit. The Kip (contribs) 16:35, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's starting to seem as if the only requirement to have a blurb is to be a famous American person on television or radio, and the community's just rolling along with that. — EF5 16:37, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Not even just TV/radio Americans, Terence Stamp got a blurb discussion and Andrew wants one for Donald McPherson below. The Kip (contribs) 17:53, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      That's not really fair. Consensus is pretty strongly against the blurb. If you were to change that to "blurb nom" I would agree with you, but that only takes one editor. GreatCaesarsGhost 18:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Second what Great Caesar's Ghost said. I wouldn't say this thread is any indication of shifting attitudes towards death blurbs, given there's only a small minority supportive of posting and this has a snowball's chance in hell of being made into a full blurb. If I weren't involved I'd close this thread as it was correctly posted to RD and it seems like (mostly) everybody is happy with leaving it at that.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 18:39, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Past discussions are what I’m referring to (Connie Francis, Hulk Hogan, etc.) EF5 19:18, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      @EF5 I don't think Francis needed one, but even as someone who detested him as an individual, Hogan was deserving of a blurb - he brought pro wrestling into the mainstream not just in the US but arguably globally. The Kip (contribs) 19:23, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      In that case, my viewpoint may be a minority, but regardless, I stand by my opinion that more American pop culture people are being discussed as blurbs than I can remember. EF5 19:25, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Blurb. Appearing in a few popular YouTube videos is blurb material now? DarkSide830 (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose blurb as the article does not show how he was important to that level of ITN. Departure– (talk) 16:46, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb - being a household name in the USA is not in itself a reason for a blurb. And procedurally, this ought not to have been promoted to a blurb nomination without clearer indication and a notification to those whose existing 'support' votes were thereby seemingly co-opted. GenevieveDEon (talk) 18:32, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Levan Gachechiladze

[edit]
Article: Levan Gachechiladze (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Inter Press News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 --QalasQalas (talk) 17:18, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Donald M. McPherson

[edit]
Article: Donald M. McPherson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): News Channel Nebraska
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Last living American World War II flying ace Toadboy123 (talk) 07:47, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait There's surprisingly little coverage of this, compared to the similar John Cruickshank below, for example, whose death was covered in detail in the top tier of national newspapers. I reckon we need more than News Channel Nebraska simply to confirm the death.
Note that the article is new. The creator, Toadboy123, seems to know what he's doing but some double-checking would be prudent. Note also that simply running this name in RD would be quite uninformative as no-one will know it, as there's little coverage. Why oh why can't we give some bare-bones details too such as the short description? Short descriptions were created for exactly this purpose and a lot of effort goes into maintaining them but ITN is still SNAFU. Per WP:SDESC,

The short description of a Wikipedia page is a brief phrase intended to complement and clarify the page title, particularly in contexts where this is seen in isolation from the page itself. Taken together, the title and short description concisely explain the subject of the page...

Andrew🐉(talk) 10:54, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think Andrew is actually suggesting a blurb, but a halfway compromise - to list his name with a few biographical details, like age and occupation. He has mentioned that other language wikis do that. FWIW, until the en Wikipedia agrees to do that across the board, this suggestion is not viable. Natg 19 (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 19

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Michael C. J. Putnam

[edit]
Article: Michael C. J. Putnam (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Brown University obituary
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American classical scholar (and namesake of an asteroid). Article is fairly short but fully cited and a decent brief biography. Scanning his obit from Brown, we're not missing too much. UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:29, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2025 Herat road crash

[edit]
Article: 2025 Herat road crash (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A multi-vehicle collision involving a bus carrying migrants deported from Iran kills at least 79 people in the Guzara District, Afghanistan. (Post)
News source(s): The Washington Post BBC Google News
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Catastrophic road accident involving a major transnational issue. ArionStar (talk) 19:29, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks horrible @Bloxzge 025 just improve it!! QalasQalas (talk) 20:47, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I mean I can try to add to it. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:57, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Working on it… ArionStar (talk) 21:59, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 @Bloxzge 025: The article is better now. ArionStar (talk) 22:25, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Razak Omotoyossi

[edit]
Article: Razak Omotoyossi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): MSN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Benin’s legend one of their all-time top scorers. QalasQalas (talk) 22:45, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Ready) RD: Eemeli Peltonen

[edit]
Article: Eemeli Peltonen (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Yle BBC Euro News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Finnish MP, committed suicide in the Parliament House after battling kidney disease. The Kip (contribs) 15:39, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Article is a bit short but well sourced. I think the article is sufficient quality for RD as I did not spot any glaring issues with it.
5.57.243.123 (talk) 16:04, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have rewritten/added to information about his death, mainly events prior to his death, and a bit of context on suicide amongst Finnish politicians. Otherwise, article is well sourced, and this has been reported across international news media. Montezuma69 (talk) 22:03, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment potential blurb? A 30-year-old sitting Member of Parliament, believed to have died by suicide inside the parliament following a struggle with illness seems interesting enough. (this is not a formulaic proposal, though) Respublik (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

S/2025 U 1

[edit]
Proposed image
Image of the Uranus system with the new moon circled in yellow
Article: S/2025 U 1 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: NASA announces the discovery of a new moon of Uranus (pictured) by the James Webb Space Telescope. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope announce the discovery of a new moon of Uranus (pictured)
News source(s): AP, Astronomy, BBC, Google News Topic, NBC, NYT, Scientific American
Credits:

 MallardTV Talk to me! 20:15, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Soft oppose Neat, but how notable is this really? 128 moons of Saturn have been discovered this year, and the second most recent discovery of a moon of Uranus was only two years ago. Estreyeria (talk) 00:48, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The moon article has been nominated at AfD. I have !voted for a speedy keep result, as I think WP:NASTRO is clearly met, but just noting this as a roadblock to posting until the AfD nom is resolved. For my part, I would like to wait to see if the current flurry of news articles is just initial hype; i.e., if substantive articles or other indicia of this moon's special significance emerge by tomorrow. FlipandFlopped 01:25, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It was soon speedily kept. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:52, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose partially per Estreyeria. This story really has zero importance, and the only reason it's getting any mainstream news coverage is because of its small size (and even then, Saturn has literally hundreds of moons that are smaller). Interesting but not particularly notable. -- Kicking222 (talk) 03:18, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Too routine new moons haven't been rare in decades but Uranus is like over double the annual James Webb distance minimum as Saturn with a quarter the local sunlight brightness and S/2025 U1 is as dark colored as asphalt. The brightness at Webb is magnitude 25.5 which is pretty effing good for such short exposure (a full orbit is only 9.6 hours and it's not motion blurred). For comparison the Sun's magnitude minus is 26.78, the Full Moon's magnitude is minus 12.78, the brightest star besides the one that causes daytime is minus 1.46, the dimmest stars you see in New York City are about positive three and a half, the dimmest stars you see in a place far far far darker than where most people live is about six and a half, the dimmest you see in that pitch black wilderness with a 200 millimeter wide pupil (lens) up to your eye at 60 times magnification is like 13, the brightest moon in the upper left is 16.6, the dimmest you see in a minutes long film exposure with a 200 inch wide telephoto lens' lens is like 22 and the dimmest you see in the EXtreme Deep Field with a 23 day (1,987,200 seconds) cumulative exposure time with an 8 foot wide eyeball pupil orbiting Earth in hard vacuum and far higher ISO than film for the same noise ISO is like 31.5. Also there was a Cassini probe that orbited Saturn 294 times discovering tons of moons Uranus has never had an orbiting spacecraft. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 04:57, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment First, make sure to include sources. Second, is the story about the moon or about the success of the JWST (like, is this the first new moon in our system its found?) that might influence which way this should be taken. Masem (t) 03:54, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, meets notability, would usually not meet significance imo, but it's encyclopedic and all of our current entries are stale (the most recent happening on 11 August). Article is short, but quality is way better than all of the 10 moons of Uranus articles I checked. Kowal2701 (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per all opposers above. EF5 20:14, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - A 9-km diameter rock around Uranus? Calling it in the news is pretty generous. And as pointed out there's been scores of new moons discovered around the other 7 planets already this year. The only real argument above is that in the dog-days of August, the other topics are stale - which simply isn't relevant. Nfitz (talk) 21:30, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It is in the news and interesting, and there is an image unlike the previous Uranus discovery. The article is on the shorter end, but is likely sufficient for the topic matter. Curbon7 (talk) 22:59, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support A new (inner) moon of a planet? Totally significant. ArionStar (talk) 03:30, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Notable and of interest. Jusdafax (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Discoveries of relatively large celestial bodies closer than Neptune don't happen often. I'd say it is one of those astronomy news that certainly deserve a place in ITN. Trepang2 (talk) 10:33, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    "Relatively large" but literally the smallest moon of Uranus. Not to mention somebody above tried to argue it's worthy of a blurb because of how small it is. Kicking222 (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    As a comparison there's 416 known natural satellites in the eight planets almost all of the four gas planets that's almost as many as the 507ish known numbered comets (the 1 Halley 2 Encke 3 etc series) and the frequent new discoveries like comet 507P/Lemmon are dim like fuck even at the brightest (Earth POV) point of the consecutive aphelion interval that contains their discovery no one would nominate them. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 18:33, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: as an astronomer, I find this discovery pretty boring and unremarkable. Last year there were dozens of new moons discovered around Saturn. The 29th moon of Uranus, with nothing more known about it, is underwhelming. But ITN is desperate for blurbs to post and the article quality is sufficient, so I won't oppose. I have written an altblurb, which fixes the attribution - NASA issued a press release but did not make the discovery. Modest Genius talk 14:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Estreyeria, Nfitz, and Modest Genius. The Kip (contribs) 17:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Modest Genius. GenevieveDEon (talk) 18:42, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's been a few days now, and there is still fairly indepth enduring coverage from within the past 24h, which signifies to me that this is different from the other "mundane" moon discoveries described above (see e.g. 1 2 3. For whatever reason, this moon is attracting more public interest - sometimes the news coverage doesn't make rational sense, but it's "in the news", so we ought to post it. FlipandFlopped 02:12, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 18

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Jean Pormanove

[edit]
Article: Jean Pormanove (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): France 24
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: French internet streamer. Thriley (talk) 03:13, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Banu Kırbağ

[edit]
Article: Banu Kırbağ (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Haberler
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Known for her folk, solo artist and composer. QalasQalas (talk) 10:40, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support farewell and RIP Banu Kırbağ she was definitely one of the most original voices I was listen to since my childhood. 185.34.130.148 (talk) 10:11, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Update is sufficient but in my opinion it would benefit from clarification from a subject expert about what is meant by her being the 'first Turkist female arranger' - the works she's first mentioned as having arranged were her own compositions, so I'm not sure of the distinction being drawn. GenevieveDEon (talk) 18:48, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Admins willing to post ITN: --QalasQalas (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is ready. The question posed by GenevieveDEon needs to be addressed. Reference number 3, which is used as a source for the "first" claim, states that she received the title of the first female orchestra conductor in the history of Turkish pop music. Hence, the claim is not sourced. Reference number 2, which explicitly talks about arrangement, says that she made music history as one of Türkiye's first female arrangers. Again, this does not confirm the "first" claim. Schwede66 23:48, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 European and Mediterranean wildfires

[edit]
Article: 2025 European and Mediterranean wildfires (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A series of wildfires across Mediterranean countries leave at least 25 people died, hundreds injured and tens of thousands evacuated. (Post)
Credits:

 ArionStar (talk) 03:28, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The title of the article is problematic. Almost all of the countries listed are European. Many of those also border the Mediterranean. Only a couple border the Mediterranean and are not in Europe. Would European and North African wildfires be a better title? HiLo48 (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fires have been ongoing since June per our article. Its also prime wildfire season, and while they aren't as frequent in Europe compared to North America or other areas of the world, they're also not rare events. If it were one single blaze over a few days that killed that many people in that short time, maybe, but not over 3 months. Masem (t) 04:23, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: I Gusti Kompyang Manila

[edit]
Article: I Gusti Kompyang Manila (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNNIndonesia
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indonesian politician and civil servant. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 17:57, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First line of article still has him in present tense. Looks decently referenced, but others may feel differently, so holding off on my !vote. GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 18:27, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 18:40, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 23:59, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support well sourced and comprehensive. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 03:04, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 17

[edit]

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(REVIEWS NEEDED) RD: John Joannopoulos

[edit]
Article: John Joannopoulos (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://news.mit.edu/2025/professor-john-joannopoulos-dies-0819
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American physicist. --12:24, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

(REVIEWS NEEDED) RD: Gayle Cook

[edit]
Article: Gayle Cook (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): FOX59 WBAA The Herald Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: She was philanthropist and co-founder of Cook {{WIR}} QalasQalas (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose per quality of the article. Career section encompases only: "In 1963, she <>co-founded the Cook Group<> As of 2013, she still served on the company's board of directors." Respublik (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Joe Caroff

[edit]
Article: Joe Caroff (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hollywood Reporter
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American graphic designer best known for designer of the iconic 007 logo. 240F:7A:6253:1:48E3:6BAF:E2EE:4210 (talk) 10:51, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Ronnie Rondell Jr.

[edit]
Article: Ronnie Rondell Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Ronnie Rondell Jr., Hollywood Stuntman Set Ablaze for Pink Floyd’s ‘Wish You Were Here’ Album Cover, Dies at 88
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Stuntman famous for being the burning man on the cover of Pink Floyd's Wish You Were Here. Article is updated and adequately sourced. - Floydian τ ¢ 21:14, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support article throughout is well sourced V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 03:02, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted to RD) RD/blurb: Terence Stamp

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Terence Stamp (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Actor Terence Stamp (pictured) dies at age 87. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ English actor Terence Stamp (pictured) dies at age 87.
News source(s): US News Sky News BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Oscar-nominated actor best known for Billy Budd and Superman. ItsShandog (talk) 15:09, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

QalasQalas (talk) 17:58, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb Support as a blurb as opposed to RD, he was a world famous actor who deserves more than a passing RD mention. Inexpiable (talk) 19:17, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    We don't use blurbs just because someone was famous. They need to be shown they were a major figure in their field, and that's not really the case for Stamp. Plus we're miles away from a quality article that its going to take a lot of work to even get there. Masem (t) 22:15, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Picture A famous face that is opportune as ITN's lead picture is currently quite stale (Jim Lovell, who died two weeks ago and whose picture has been used for over a week now) Andrew🐉(talk) 22:45, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose on quality - way too much of this is unsourced for me to even be comfortable with an RD. EF5 22:51, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Citations have been added to support previously unsourced content. Please advise if any further statements require referencing, Thank you. ItsShandog (talk) 09:44, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose blurb For RD inline sourcing needs to be fixed. As for the blurb oppose, I needn't remind editors here of the many blurb discussions for more recognizable actors which didn't pass. Also, an odd comment above opposing an RD and supporting a blurb (we can post both, if it qualifies for the latter obviously it does for the former). Gotitbro (talk) 23:06, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 16

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime


(REVIEWS NEEDED) RD: Graeme Campbell

[edit]
Article: Graeme Campbell (politician) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-18/kalgoorlie-remembers-former-federal-mp-graeme-campbell/105662674
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Australian MP from 1980 to 1998. --12:30, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

  • Comment: Article could use some clarification for readers not familiar with Australian politics. I am unsure what it means when he "crossed the floor on gold tax", had "numerous run-ins with the Labor leadership", or what the Mabo decision was. SpencerT•C 19:44, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Larry Jones

[edit]
Article: Larry Jones (basketball) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.dispatch.com/story/sports/high-school/2025/08/19/columbus-mourns-aba-pioneer-larry-jones-who-starred-for-east-high/85723082007/
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The first American Basketball Association player to reach 5,000 career points. --12:18, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

(Posted) RD: Tomo Sakurai

[edit]
Article: Tomo Sakurai (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Comic Book
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Sakurai's voice was more recognizable than her figure. QalasQalas (talk) 15:36, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn’t this be under the announced date of death, not the actual date, which is why I nominated it under Saturday? First announcement of her passing was on her Twitter yesterday. Anyway, oppose due to lack of citations, needs a lot of work. GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 01:57, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: John Cruickshank

[edit]
Article: John Cruickshank (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, Telegraph, The Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Last surviving WW2 Victoria Cross recipient. Need a lot more sources. --12:53, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

RD: Dan Tana

[edit]
Article: Dan Tana (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hollywood Reporter, Deadline Hollywood, Variety
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Owner of Dan Tana's. His death was announced on 16 August. 240F:7A:6253:1:E0A2:9BC2:F62B:1150 (talk) 09:29, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2025 Russia–United States summit

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: 2025 Russia–United States summit (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The summit meeting between Russia and the United States (presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump pictured) in Anchorage, Alaska, ends without an agreement on ending the Russia–Ukraine war. (Post)
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Despite no apparent result except media headlines (which may have been the actual objective for both leaders), the summit has been the main topic in international media for days.  Sandstein 15:41, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support it's a non-event, but it's a lot more of an event than some other non-events we post, and it's in global headlines. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 15:45, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but for me this summit is not "significant" enough, without a clear result. Putin and Trump have met (or had discussions) in the past. Natg 19 (talk) 16:35, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia doesn't care whether Natg 19 considers something important. It's about whether the sources consider it important. Which they do. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 19:27, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
While we use sources to make sure something is covered in the news, we still use consensus of editors to determine if what's reported in the news is significant enough to post for ITN, because being an encyclopedia, not everything that newspapers considers important are considered encyclopedic. Masem (t) 19:33, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Whether something is encyclopedic is decided by WP:N. Consensus is decided by WP:DISCUSSCONSENSUS, which says that consensus is determined through policy, sources, and common sense. WP:LOCALCONSENSUS also says that groups of editors can't decide that policies don't apply to their area. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 19:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I don't disagree with this, as this would allow for more objectivity at ITN instead of just hand waving why something should/should not be posted. But this is not how we do things here, as WP:ITNSIGNIF says to use "local consensus" to determine post-ability.Natg 19 (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Then ITNSIGNIF violates policy and its enforcement is disruptive editing. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 21:27, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ITNSIGNIF exists on top of sitewide policies, not as a replacement for them. ITN doesn't decide if something is encyclopedic, ITN simply decides what to feature. Yes, it is subjective, but so is the entire rest of the main page (nothing more subjective than the "sufficiently interesting" criteria of DYK). So are the sitewide notability guidelines; what is notable or not notable is not always so black and white, hence why it's a source of endless debate. ITN having a set of subjective criteria for determining which content to feature is perfectly fine and in no way a LOCALCONSENSUS vio. I understand you do not recognize ITNSIGNIF and would prefer that ITN as a whole did not exist, but making this known in most every ITN thread you participate in and arguing with people from the perspective that ITNSIGNIF is not real, sometimes rudely so ("Wikipedia doesn't care whether Natg 19 considers something important") is disruptive. Natg was simply following agreed upon processes and didn't do anything incorrect here.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 21:40, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per most above and close per WP:SNOW. Departure– (talk) 15:00, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Bob Simpson

[edit]
Article: Bob Simpson (cricketer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Australian Test cricketer and coach HiLo48 (talk) 04:03, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: